I would've respected Edwards' endorsement a lot more, if
- He hadn't repeatedly said that "Barack Obama is the MAN to do it . . ."
- It hadn't been clearly timed to take attention away from Hillary's WV win
- I hadn't then within 20 minutes received an email from him asking for money for his college scholarship program (to which I responded letting him know exactly why I wasn't going to donate)
- It made any sort of logical sense
The last is the thing I can't figure out. From my understanding of the announcement, Edwards saw that Obama was having difficulty attracting the core democratic electorate, and so he decided to endorse him. Am I the only one that sees those two statements as orthogonal to each other?? Why not throw your support behind the person who
CAN attract the electorate on their own merit??
The Obama supporter with whom I take the train (and I
still can't figure out why he's an Obama supporter) and I had an interesting discussion this morning, he's still not entirely sure that Obama can win against McCain in the fall, and he said he thinks Hillary's staying in the race so that when McCain wins, she'll be able to say "I told you so," and she'll get the nomination in four years handed to her on a silver platter. It's an interesting thought, and the only thing giving me comfort at the moment.